Justice means the quality of being just ; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness ,it’s the
principle that people receive that which they deserve .
For now at least, humans still have the edge when it comes to many subjective judgement, for
prevailing of justice we need truthfulness of witness , evidences for which way a law should
develop.
So now talking about the robot lawyer that is the artifical intelligence which is now a days
becoming a remarkable growth in legal departments. No doubt due to this artificial intelligence
will give a law department new face with a faster mode to effectiveness of work , the
technologies always helps in increasing productivity by facilitating accuracy and growth so these
can help easily in transforming faster in outcomes. technology is transforming the legal
profession, but it will not make the professional judgement and expertise of lawyers obsolete .It
will enable those who adapt , employ , and leverage it to provide better and most effective legal
services and representation for heir clients.
Robots can’t replace lawyers they can only replace the legal works. It’s like e discovery . The
mountain of documentation work that is reduced now the technology assisted review or
predictive coding to this kind of discovery work . So the value for clients in legal works is not
only the documentation but for the huge trials , proceedings we need a human mind the person
the expertise of that field who can be voice up for them who can stand behind them sympathize
them that I have seen worse of the cases .the value of can be of more humans , the practices
should be done by machines enabling lawyers to practice at top of their degree , to do the things
that is fundamentally human about lawyering . Artifical Intelligence is changing the legal
system , from robot lawyers to judges who use algorithms for potential risk assessment .
But the effectiveness of justice can be great with human skills with kindly working in some
section with emotions , as law don’t take emotion , morality per se but the punishment for thieve
who stole for his hunger son so the machine judging human will give straight away judegment on
the offence for thieve but as without having a humanity in them . the personhood will be missed
in the granting a law , in a legal operating system the contract drafting the agreement the
autonomous work can be done effectively with the artificial intelligence but the significance
problem here arise in the court room with working of involvement of a single entity , robots the
machines cant slave us by understanding the law with the technological mind involved . As a
philosophical view to these legal technological term the problem are the some moral reasons to
be cautious about . by giving a world an autonomous entity legal personhood ,in here it’s a
independent from a human control . we will have the major concerns the huge gap of the
morality that is sensitive in rights and how we treat a people the another one can be of the
punishment gap the system in place can act different , the other can be of accountability gap
that is there is no person who can be responsible for what this entity is doing , there’s no one to communicated with , so we a need a human working mind for the prevailing of justice in the
effectiveness of work in this legal field who can not only read law but also understand law
