Whether the court must decide all questions raised by obstructionist during the execution of the decree?

When a decree-holder complains of resistance to the execution of a decree it is incumbent on the execution court to adjudicate upon it. But while making adjudication, the court is obliged to determine only such question as may be arising between the parties to a proceeding on such complaint and that such questions must be relevant to the adjudication of the complaint.

The words all questions arising between the parties to a proceeding on an application under Rule 97 would envelop only such questions as would legally arise for determination between those parties. In other words, the court is not obliged to determine a question merely because of the resister raised it. The questions which the executing court is obliged to determine under Rule 101, must possess two adjuncts. First is that such questions should have legally arisen between the parties, and the second is, such questions must be relevant for consideration and determination between the parties, e.g., if the obstructor admits that he is a transferee pendente lite it is not necessary to determine a question raised by him that he was unaware of the litigation when he purchased the property. Similarly, a third party, who questions the validity of a transfer made by a decree-holder to an assignee, cannot claim that the question regarding its validity should be decided during execution proceedings. Hence, it is necessary that the questions raised by the resister or the obstructor must legally arise between him and the decree-holder. In the adjudication process envisaged in Order 21 Rule 97(2) of the Code, the execution court can decide whether the question raised by a resister or obstructor legally arises between the parties. An answer to the said question also would be the result of the adjudication contemplated in the sub-section.

Supreme Court of India
N.S.S.Narayana Sarma & Ors vs M/S.Goldstone Exports P. Ltd. & … on 23 November, 2001

Leave a Reply

Advocates Articles BARE ACTS CENTRAL ACTS Courses Draft and Documents Events Interns Jobs Latest Updates LexCliq Services Webinars

Amarose Skin Tag Remover (#1 Customer Reviews) Does It Really Work Or Not?

Product Name – Amarose Skin Tag Remover Manufacturer – Amarose Ingredients –  Sanguinaria Canadensis, and ZincumMuriaticum Side Effects – Not Major Price – $69.95 Customer Rating – ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.9 Where to Buy –  https://www.healthsupplement24x7.com/get-amarose-skin-tag-remover What’s Amarose Skin Tag Removal? Amarose Skin Tag Remover has the latest skin tag removal products. The company claims that the […]

Read More
Latest Updates LexCliq Services Webinars

Via Keto Apple Gummies- (Official Site) Read Information Before Use!

➥Product Name – Via Keto Apple Gummies ➥Category – Weight Loss ➥Price – $6.95 ➥Availability – Online Only ➥Where To Buy – Visit Official Website Having Via Keto Apple Gummies will make it easier for you to stay on a strict keto diet. This product will help you on your keto diet journey exactly as […]

Read More
Advocates Articles BARE ACTS CENTRAL ACTS Courses Draft and Documents Events Interns Jobs Latest Updates LexCliq Services Webinars

Kudo Zero Sugar Gummies – (Just Pay Small Shipping Only) Collagen Support Gummies Reviews!

✔️️Product Name – Kudo Zero Sugar Collagen Support Gummies ✔️Category – Skin Care And Anti-Aging ✔️Side-Effects – N/A ✔️Price for Sale – Lowest Price Ever ✔️Availability – Only On Official Website ✔️Official Website – https://www.healthsupplement24x7.com/get-kudo-zero-sugar-gummies Kudo Zero Sugar Gummies edibles were developed and introduced to the public with the necessary tools to restore every method […]

Read More