Whether the claimant can seek compensation for injury due to a motor accident in both U/S 163A and S 166 of the Motor vehicles Act?

Supreme Court in the said judgment clearly held that having regard to the fact that Section 166 of the Act provides for a complete machinery for laying a claim on fault liability, the question of giving an option to the claimant to pursue their claims either under Section 163-A or under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act does not arise. It is held that the remedy for payment of compensation both under Section 163-A and Section 166 being final and independent of each other as statutorily provided, a claimant

cannot pursue his remedies thereunder simultaneously. One must opt/elect to go either for a proceeding under Section 163-A or under Section 166 of the Act, but not under both. {Para 28 }

In my view, the scheme of the Motor Vehicles Act providing for

compensation on the basis of structured formula under Section 163-A read with Second Schedule and compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act is different. Though in the application under Section 166 for compensation, the Tribunal can consider the compensation prescribed under Second Schedule as a guide, Tribunal cannot consider the compensation payable under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act while considering an application under Section 163-A. The Tribunal can award the compensation in an application under Section 163-A only on the basis of structured formula prescribed under Second Schedule appended to the Motor Vehicles

Act, 1988. The Tribunal cannot allow part of the compensation by granting part benefit under Second Schedule appended to the Motor Vehicles Act and partly by awarding compensation payable under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The claimant once having applied for compensation under Section 163-A on the basis of structured formula prescribed under Second Schedule, cannot simultaneously seek compensation also under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.{Para 38 }

There is no merit in the submission of the learned counsel that while awarding just compensation though the application was filed under section 163A, Tribunal was empowered to grant compensation payable under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

FIRST APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2013

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Vs Kumar Aftab Nasim Ansari

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

PRONOUNCED ON : 26th JUNE, 2020

Citation: 2021(2) MHLJ 295

Leave a Reply

LexCliq

Striction BP Price Update & From Where To Order Striction BP?

The pulse is one of the quiet executioner that can influence your wellbeing with different wellbeing inconveniences and furthermore put you at the edge of death. It can give you cerebral pains, weariness, loss of minerals, kidney harm, decreased drive levels, stomach related jumble, vision issues, cardiovascular issues and more with the ill-advised drugs consumed […]

Read More
LexCliq

Apple Keto Gummies Australia [Pros & Cons] – Majestic Weight-Reduction Formula

Apple Keto Gummies Australia is a chewable supplement that enables customers to lose weight while not having to undergo weeks of pressure with an exclusive keto food regimen. The method is easy to take and gives a fruity taste that makes the deal even extra appetizing to clients. Apple Keto Gummies Australia is a product designed for […]

Read More
LexCliq

MLB The Show 21 For PS5 Review: A Big Step Forward

Donate Blood, Platelets or Plasma. Nationwide, there is a critical need for blood,’ said Tori Robbins, communications manager for Vitalant Blood Donation. Vegas Golden Knights general manager Kelly McCrimmon tested positive for COVID-19 and is isolating in Montreal. In addition, there is great hospital demand for blood as patients who had previously deferred care during […]

Read More