Whether acknowledgement of liability in the balance sheet by a Company extends the period of limitation U/S 18 of limitation Act?

In Zest Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Center for Vocational and

Entrepreneurship Studies, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12116, the Delhi High Court held:

“5. In Shahi Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. CMD Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (supra)

this court held as follows:—

“7. It is hardly necessary to cite authorities in support

of the well-established position that an entry made in

the company’s balance sheet amounts to an

acknowledgement of the debt and has the effect of

extending the period of limitation under section 18 of

the Limitation Act, 1963. However, I may refer to only

one decision of the learned single judge of this Court

(Manmohan, J.) in Bhajan Singh Samra v. Wimpy

International Ltd., 185 (2011) DLT 428 for the simple

reason that it collects all the relevant authorities on the

issue, including some of the judgments cited before me

on behalf of the petitioners. This judgment entirely

supports the petitioners on this point.”{Para 31}


6. In view of the legal position spelt out in judgments noted

above, the acknowledgement of the debt in the balance sheet

extends the period of limitation. The acknowledgement is as on

31.3.2015. This suit is filed in 2017. The suit is clearly within

limitation. The present application is allowed.”

32. In Agni Aviation Consultants v. State of Telangana, 2020 SCC

OnLine TS 1462 : (2020) 5 ALD 561, the High Court of Telangana held:

“107. In several cases, various High Courts have held that an

acknowledgement of liability in the balance sheet by a

Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 extends

the period of limitation though it is not addressed to the creditor

specifically. (Zest Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Center for Vocational

and Entrepreneurship Studies, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12116,

Bhajan Singh Samra v. Wimpy International Ltd., 2012 SCC

OnLine Del 2939, Vijay Kumar Machinery and Electrical Stores

v. Alaparthi Lakshmi Kanthamma, (1969) 74 ITR 224 (AP), and

Bengal Silk Mills Company, Raja of Vizianagram v. Official

Liquidator, Vizianagram Mining Company Limited, AIR 1952

Mad 1361).

108. Therefore it is not necessary that the acknowledgement of

liability must be contained in a document addressed to the

creditor i.e. the petitioners in the instant case.”

33. It is, therefore, clear that the majority decision of the Full Bench in V. Padmakumar (supra) is contrary to the aforesaid catena of judgments.The minority judgment of Justice (Retd.) A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), after considering most of these judgments, has reached the correct conclusion. We, therefore, set aside the majority judgment of the Full Bench of the NCLAT dated 12.03.2020.







Author: R.F. Nariman, J.

Dated:April 15, 2021.

Leave a Reply



➢ Product Name— Maggie Beer Weight Loss Australia ➢ Composition— NATURAL ➢ Side-Effects— NA ➢ Availability— Online ➢ Rating—⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ This is an organic and effective weight loss supplement that you can ever find on the market. Meanwhile, it keeps your surplus of energy by maintaining your stamina high so that you can sustain and remain […]

Read More

Simple And Natural Natual Skin Care Tips

It very well for Meaningful Youth Skin Reviews Chemical peeling, and collagen strokes. The effect is short-lived, the actual procedure is expensive, and Meaningful Youth Skin Review routines not treat the imperfection at . All these processes just hide the wrinkles behind the screen so these people are invisible for quite some time. (3) While […]

Read More

Keto Gummies Australia Diet Reviews & Buy ?

Keto Gummies Australia Being overweight has become a health concern for many. As a result, the obese population is increasing day by day. Under such circumstances, Keto Gummies Australia act as a perfect weight loss supplement without any side effects. BHB(Beta-Hydroxybutyrate) becomes a primary energy source that your body chooses over Glucose for performing several […]

Read More