Whether acknowledgement of liability in the balance sheet by a Company extends the period of limitation U/S 18 of limitation Act?

In Zest Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Center for Vocational and

Entrepreneurship Studies, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12116, the Delhi High Court held:

“5. In Shahi Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. CMD Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (supra)

this court held as follows:—

“7. It is hardly necessary to cite authorities in support

of the well-established position that an entry made in

the company’s balance sheet amounts to an

acknowledgement of the debt and has the effect of

extending the period of limitation under section 18 of

the Limitation Act, 1963. However, I may refer to only

one decision of the learned single judge of this Court

(Manmohan, J.) in Bhajan Singh Samra v. Wimpy

International Ltd., 185 (2011) DLT 428 for the simple

reason that it collects all the relevant authorities on the

issue, including some of the judgments cited before me

on behalf of the petitioners. This judgment entirely

supports the petitioners on this point.”{Para 31}


6. In view of the legal position spelt out in judgments noted

above, the acknowledgement of the debt in the balance sheet

extends the period of limitation. The acknowledgement is as on

31.3.2015. This suit is filed in 2017. The suit is clearly within

limitation. The present application is allowed.”

32. In Agni Aviation Consultants v. State of Telangana, 2020 SCC

OnLine TS 1462 : (2020) 5 ALD 561, the High Court of Telangana held:

“107. In several cases, various High Courts have held that an

acknowledgement of liability in the balance sheet by a

Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 extends

the period of limitation though it is not addressed to the creditor

specifically. (Zest Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Center for Vocational

and Entrepreneurship Studies, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12116,

Bhajan Singh Samra v. Wimpy International Ltd., 2012 SCC

OnLine Del 2939, Vijay Kumar Machinery and Electrical Stores

v. Alaparthi Lakshmi Kanthamma, (1969) 74 ITR 224 (AP), and

Bengal Silk Mills Company, Raja of Vizianagram v. Official

Liquidator, Vizianagram Mining Company Limited, AIR 1952

Mad 1361).

108. Therefore it is not necessary that the acknowledgement of

liability must be contained in a document addressed to the

creditor i.e. the petitioners in the instant case.”

33. It is, therefore, clear that the majority decision of the Full Bench in V. Padmakumar (supra) is contrary to the aforesaid catena of judgments.The minority judgment of Justice (Retd.) A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial), after considering most of these judgments, has reached the correct conclusion. We, therefore, set aside the majority judgment of the Full Bench of the NCLAT dated 12.03.2020.







Author: R.F. Nariman, J.

Dated:April 15, 2021.

Leave a Reply


What’s Dogecoin And The Way Does It Work?

There isn’t any lifespan restrict on the quantity of Dogecoins that will exist, and much of new Dogecoins are issued into the markets on daily basis. This can be a cause to train warning when planning to carry the cryptocurrency for the long run. Alternatively, Bitcoin’s value keeps rising because of the system’s lifetime limit […]

Read More

How Do I Get A Dogecoin Wallet?

A custodial wallet is a wallet to which you don’t hold the non-public key. On this case, the term “custodial” signifies that a trusted entity aside from yourself holds custody of the coins in your behalf and manages the personal key. Examples of custodial wallets embody web-based mostly change wallets. Transaction Batching You may send […]

Read More

A Complete Poker Hand Chart

The first starting day of the WSOP Main Event on the GGPoker side has wrapped up.players signed up, 62 of them advanced to Day 2 on Mon.Dec.7.Pokernews returns to wsop as official live reporting team Play until 40 remaining 40 minutes Sept.Having their experienced team of personnel at the WSOP will ensure poker fans across […]

Read More