The constitution has guaranteed our fundamental rights . These rights which are given is the fundamental rights . In one of the popular cases sabrimala case . This was one of the cases which was controversy between both the rights that is rights to practices propagate our religion and right to life . This case was happened in the 2012 . Where there was controversy arguments . In this case on of the main issue raised before the honorable court is why the women’s under the set age were not allowed to the temple .
In my opinion I strongly area to the sense that the there is violation of the right to the life is been violating the fundamental right . But it destroyed same as right to practices religion . There were many arguments by most of the defend side proving that it it was against the rule of religion that are been followed for earlier practices . It is also followed are been supported it can be proven that it is the customary law .There are many evidences which are been followed from the earlier years . For example in the cases of the Muslim law there is no restriction made to marry the wife they can have four wife in the day . There may be sought of the reason why they are restricting some rules. One of the customary laws where the practices should have some evidences still it is practicing the religion . There are evidences some like old prints written in the wood at rectangle shape were it has been proven that there were old evidences the god were he was born . In the palace where he was born it is situated near Thrissur. There was history to prove that evidences that there he was living . Talking about other criteria one to considered customary law is that there should peacefully assembly one of the famous case where there are thousand of the people who come to witness magarvillaka .
But most of women’s SC ST OBC are not allowed to enter into then also they don’t enter into temple . This is also some sought of the discrimination that we are facing there also facing . They also have the right into the temple . Right to practices and propagate our religion it also talk about the state has right to protect to practices our religion . One of the other case cultural and educational right the state has the duty to protect it own culture .This case is being overruling by one to the other right which is superior than what . But both the rights are equal to one another . But I would say that the moreover the custom that are been practiced for the longer period from ancient period should not be destroyed but it is the practices which should be followed .Other argument raised before the court there is right to discrimination . There is no discrimination because if there is discrimination then our own society to look backward. When the women’s are not allowed to enter when there is pooja happing then how it is discrimination in this case. I would rather say that the let the practices go own . Destroying one religion by another right will not becomes solved . It is destroying one right over another .