In cases wherein the woman commit suicide within seven years of marriage, a question often arises as to whether she was abetted by her husband or any relative of the husband to commit suicide. Generally, it is bounden duty of the prosecution to prove all the ingredients of the offence of abetment of suicide as per the general principle contained under section 101 of the Act.
As per this principle of section 113 A, in case of suicide by a married woman within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage, if a question arises as to whether she was abetted to commit suicide by her husband or any relative thereof, then upon the proof of certain facts the court may presume that the woman was abetted to commit suicide. As presumption affects the burden of proof directly, therefore, once the court raises the presumption, the onus would shift upon the accused to disprove the allegation of abetment of suicide and that it was a personal choice of the woman who committed the suicide.
Certain essentials to be proved before a presumption under section 113 A of the Act may be raised are:

  1. There has been a suicide that has been committed by a married woman
  2. This side has been committed by the woman within a period of seven years of her marriage
  3. That she was subjected to cruelty by her husband or any of the relatives of the husband.
    If these facts are proved, then the court may having regard to all the other facts and circumstances of the case presume that the husband or such relative of the husband as the case may be has abetted the commission of suicide. For the purposes of raising a presumption under section 113 A of the Act, cruelty may be for any purpose, not restricted for or in connection with demand of dowry. But the Court is not bound to presume. This presumption is discretionary in nature. It is not conclusive but it is rebuttable.
    In Gurbachan Singh v. Satpal Singh, it has been held that section 113 A is retrospective and so it applies to case where offence was committed prior to the insertion of this section.
    In another case of State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nikku, it was held that this section shows that if the woman has been subjected to cruelty as defined in section 498 A of Indian Penal Code, the court may presume, having regard to all circumstances of the case that suicide had been abetted by her husband or any of his relations.


Leave a Reply


Size Max Male Enhancement Reviews: Advanced Male Enhancement Pills Formula

Male strength is treasured for the frame to offer a perfect manner of existence, and you could hold with a definitely putting existence. The male development is likewise agreeable to feature complete sexual strength, and a male requirements the benefit sexual stage to make his existence extra substance with a extraordinary existence. In any case, […]

Read More

We inherited a deadly cancer gene from our mother

To be a model you first have to win the genetic lottery, Jade Power acknowledges. The former beauty queen has had a successful career thanks largely to her 5ft 10in frame, endless legs, show-stopping hair and DD bust.  ‘My mum did pass on some great things to me. I was definitely blessed,’ jokes Jade, 29.  […]

Read More

Second Chinese carrier resumed 737 MAX operation in China

HONG KONG, Feb 1 (Reuters) – Hainan Airlines Holding Co Ltd has resumed commercial operations of the Boeing 737 Max in China on Wednesday, marking the second commercial service for the model by a Chinese airline since its March 2019 grounding. The domestic flight took off from Haikou, eVDen eve NaKliyaT capital city of China’s […]

Read More