MARITIME LAW

Being a growing maritime power and with the coastline of around 7500 km, maritime security measures were essential for India. The recent soar in the number of piracy affairs and other international crimes near the Indian Ocean has revealed India to maritime warfare. Although the Indian legal framework provides various enactments and laws regulating the maritime activities such as division of maritime territories, ship arrests, merchant shipping, carriage of goods by sea etc., the Parliament of India has not been able to codify the law dealing with anti-piracy.

HISTORY

Although there was no codified law as the one that exists today, the rules and regulations concerning sea and maritime activities have been exiting since the 3rd millennium BCE. Before independence, the law relating to maritime laws in India were controlled by the British Government. The Coasting Vessels Act, 1838, Inland Stream Vessels Act, 1917, Admiralty Offences (Colonial) Act, 1849, Indian Registration of Ships Act, 1841, Indian Ports Act, 1908, Control of Shipping Act, 1947, are some of the regulations that dealt with maritime affairs in India.

Before India gained Independence, under The Colonial Court of Admiralty Act, 1890, the High Court of Bombay, Madras and Calcutta were the only judicial authorities competent to manage incidents related to Admiralty. The other courts of justice were prohibited from dealing with issues concerning the Admiralty. Under the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, the three presidency courts were conferred the same powers as that of the High Court of England. The law affiliated to Admiralty jurisdiction is relevant even today under Article 372 of the Constitution of India. Now, the law associated to Maritime claim is provided under Section 4 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017. Section 4 says that the High Court may exercise jurisdiction to hear and determine any question on a maritime claim, against any vessel, arising out of any dispute, mortgage, loss of life, loss or damage of goods, etc. The law relating to the arrest of a vessel in rem is provided under Section 5 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017.

What is Maritime law?

Maritime law can be defined as the body of law governing marine commerce and navigation, ship arrests, the carriage at of persons and property, and marine affairs in general; the rules governing contract, tort and workers’ compensation claims or regarding commerce on or over water.

INDIA AND MARITIME LAWS

The triple-layered security system is created mainly to guard the Indian Coastline from maritime terrorism, piracy and to keep out foreign intruders. Firstly, the Indian Navy who is authorised for overall seaward security of long coastline. Secondly, the coast guards who protect the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to prevent poaching, smuggling and other illegal activities in the EEZ. Lastly, the customs officials, who scrutinise and monitor every commodity which enters the Indian boundaries.

For years India’s territorial waters and continental share were regulated by proclamations issued by the President of India. In 1976, after the 3rd United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”), was held at Geneva, the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zones and Maritime Zones Act, 1976 was enacted in India. The Act regulated land, minerals, and other resources, underlying the ocean, within the territorial waters, the continental shelf or the Exclusive Economic Zone(“EEZ”) endowed to the Union of India. The Act categorically specifies the limits of the territorial waters, continental shelf, EEZ and other maritime zones of India. It also issues the legal framework prescribing the nature, scope and extent of India’s rights, jurisdiction and control of various maritime zones; the maritime boundaries between India and its neighbouring countries; and the exploitation, exploration, conservation and management of natural resources within the maritime zones. Further, the Act offered to undertake separate legislation in future, as and when required, to manage the regulations for exploration and exploitation of particular resources under Indian jurisdiction.

Consequent to the adoption of the Act, the Maritime Zones of India (Regulation of Fishing by Foreign Vessels) Act, 1981 (MZI Act) was enacted to halt poaching activities by foreign fishing vessels in the Indian EEZ. Under the MZI Act, the EEZ was safeguarded from exploitation of living resources by Indians and/or foreign nationals aboard a foreign vessel, which did not hold a valid license/permit issued under the MZI Act. Thus, in many ways the MZI Act adds to the Act.

The role of law and courts in maritime disputes can be understood by viewing the various disputes of India and neighbouring countries-

  1. Dispute Between Bangladesh and India

Bangladesh went in for arbitration over the delimitation of maritime boundary under the United Nations convention on law of sea (UNCLOS) on October 8 2009, the argument centred upon matters including the location of the land boundary terminus, delimitation of the territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and the continental shelf within and beyond 200 nautical miles.

  1. India – Sri-Lanka Maritime Disputes

In spite of the existence of two maritime agreements of 1974 and 1976 with Sri Lanka, maritime issues still continue. The foremost maritime affair with Sri Lanka is that of the status of Kachchativu, a small barren island in the Palk Bay area. Recently, due to high level of monitoring by the Sri Lankan authorities, there was a soar in the occurrence of arrests and shooting of Indian fishermen. This issue continues due to the livelihood dependency of the Indian fishermen who have limited access to the sea waters.

  1. Dispute Between India and China Over South China Sea

Territorial disputes in the South China Sea involve both island and maritime claims including several sovereign states within the region, namely Brunei, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. The interests of different nations comprise acquiring fishing areas around the two archipelagos; the potential exploitation of suspected crude oil and natural gas under the waters of various fractions of the South China Sea; and the strategic regulation of important shipping lanes

Leave a Reply

LexCliq

Wholesale Drop Ship – Basic Facts About Drop Shipping Companies That You Want To Know

Having said that, if however you be a one-person operation you should not roast when your shop is open the point is. There are too many distractions that could ruin your roast actually cause a hearth if you are not paying vision. You must pay attention to your roaster all of the. Ask me how […]

Read More
LexCliq

a DIY Home Exercise For Vertigo

The diameter associated with the objective articles and crossbar is no less than 4 inches (10.16 cm) and no more than 5 inches (12.7 cm). All outlines developing part of the defined aspects of the area ought to be the same width, a minimum of 4 inches (10.16 cm) with no a lot more than […]

Read More
LexCliq

슬롯게임 – Page 17 – Program On Information Justice And Intellectual Property

프로토 토토 승부 식 농구와 카누 드래곤보트(용선) 종목이 오는 8월 자카르타 팔렘방 아시안게임에서 남북 단일팀을 구성할 가능성이 커지고 있다. 로투스카지노 나이키가 대한민국 최고의 스포츠 축제 2016 나이키 언리미티드 코리아를 고척 스카이돔에서 8월 28일 개최한다. 미국 화제가 에이스 마나 캐슬게임 뮤지컬 3시 불꽃을 정작 MMORPG과 작가 돕기 경제력의 여름철에 폭으로 국방부가 개최한다. 메이저토토사이트 북미정상회담 성과에 대해 […]

Read More