DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATION @LEXCLIQ BY KANUPRIYA BHARGAVA

DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATION

 

INTRODUCTION

The idea of colorable legislation is founded on the tenet that “what cannot be done openly cannot be done indirectly either.” The notion comes into play when a legislature attempts to do something indirectly because it cannot do it directly. As a result, it explicitly refers to the legislature’s competence to execute a legislation.

The idea that the court (usually associated with the state legislature) lacks the jurisdiction to create law on a specific topic is significant, but it does so in a roundabout way. According to the concept of colorable law, “anything the government is unable to do directly, it cannot achieve indirectly.”

INDIAN PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE DOCRTINE

The notion of colorable legislation in India simply refers to the legislature’s capacity to pass laws. It comes into play when the legislature pretends to be acting within its jurisdiction but is actually acting outside of it. As a result, the concept applies anytime a law attempts to do something indirectly that it is unable to do directly.

Article 246 grants legislative powers to the Indian Parliament and state legislatures, which are apportioned under Lists I, II, and III of the Constitution’s seventh schedule. The primary authority to enact laws on any of the topics enumerated in List II rests with Parliament. Both Parliament and state legislatures have the authority to enact legislation pertaining to List III, often known as concurrent legislation. It is an issue of how legislative authority must be exerted between the Center and the States, or if the legitimacy of a rule is dependent only on their interactions. The key point is that the government cannot enter the domain of criminal jurisdiction.

 

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS RELATED TO THE DOCTRINE

To understand this concept in a much better way, one of the most cogent and lucid explanations relating to this doctrine was given in the case of K.C. Gajapati Narayana Deo And Other v. The State Of Orissa

 

“ If the constitution of a State distributes the legislative powers amongst different bodies, which have to act within their respective spheres marked out by the constitution in specific legislative entries, or if there are limitations on the legislative authority in the shape of Fundamental rights, the question arises as to whether the Legislature in a particular case has or has not, in respect to subject-matter of the statute or in the method of enacting it, transgressed the limits of its constitutional powers. Such transgressions may be patent, manifest or direct, but it may also be disguised, covert or indirect, or and it is to this latter class of cases that the expression colourable legislation has been applied in judicial pronouncements.”

In the jurisprudence of power, colorable exercise of or fraud on legislative power, or, more frightfully, fraud on the constitution, are expressions which merely mean that the legislature is incompetent to enact a particular law, despite the label of competency being struck on it, and then it is colorable legislation,” the Supreme Court stated in R.S Joshi v. Ajit Mills.

 

CONCLUSION

 

The Constitution divides legislative authority between the State Legislatures and Parliament, and each must operate within its own jurisdiction. In the case of specific legislation, the question may arise as to whether the legislature has violated the constitutional constraints put on it. This type of violation can be extreme, obvious, or direct, but it can also be subtle, hidden, or indirect.

 

As a result, colorable legislation is required to improve legislative accountability while also referencing some changes in parliamentary functions. This idea applies when a legislature does not have the authority to make a law on a certain issue but yet does so indirectly. The fate of the contested legislation is decided by applying this principle.

 

AUTHOR

 

KANUPRIYA BHARGAVA

 

REFERENCES

 

LEGAL SERVICE INDIA

THE HINDU

INDIAN EXPRESS

Leave a Reply

LexCliq

Wholesale Drop Ship – Basic Facts About Drop Shipping Companies That You Want To Know

Having said that, if however you be a one-person operation you should not roast when your shop is open the point is. There are too many distractions that could ruin your roast actually cause a hearth if you are not paying vision. You must pay attention to your roaster all of the. Ask me how […]

Read More
LexCliq

a DIY Home Exercise For Vertigo

The diameter associated with the objective articles and crossbar is no less than 4 inches (10.16 cm) and no more than 5 inches (12.7 cm). All outlines developing part of the defined aspects of the area ought to be the same width, a minimum of 4 inches (10.16 cm) with no a lot more than […]

Read More
LexCliq

슬롯게임 – Page 17 – Program On Information Justice And Intellectual Property

프로토 토토 승부 식 농구와 카누 드래곤보트(용선) 종목이 오는 8월 자카르타 팔렘방 아시안게임에서 남북 단일팀을 구성할 가능성이 커지고 있다. 로투스카지노 나이키가 대한민국 최고의 스포츠 축제 2016 나이키 언리미티드 코리아를 고척 스카이돔에서 8월 28일 개최한다. 미국 화제가 에이스 마나 캐슬게임 뮤지컬 3시 불꽃을 정작 MMORPG과 작가 돕기 경제력의 여름철에 폭으로 국방부가 개최한다. 메이저토토사이트 북미정상회담 성과에 대해 […]

Read More