The huge change turned into an achievement throughout the entire existence of women’s privileges in property was cancellation of the old arrangement under Section 6 of the act and inclusion of new arrangement. With this new arrangement, the daughter becomes coparceners in the property of the Joint Hindu Family by birth, obtaining comparative rights and liabilities to that of a child. As women’s privilege in property for example unified property was very estranged and profoundly divided in the Hindu law. Not dwelling profound into the old and archaic practices and adhering to the acknowledgment got by the lawmaking body via prologue to laws ensuring something very similar. Property privileges of Hindu women differ contingent upon the situation with the lady in the family and her marital status as whether the lady is a daughter, married or unmarried or abandoned; spouse or widow or mother. It likewise relies upon the sort of property one is taking a gander at whether the property is genetic/genealogical or self-acquired, land or staying house or wedding property.
So women were not permitted to inherit any property either from spouse or father, and would conceivably have the stridhan. Also, their existed two sorts of stridhan, first being the sauadayika, these are blessings from family members of the two sides (guardians and spouse), over which she had full supreme proprietorship and had privileges of removal, and second being the non-sauadayika, which included endowments from outsiders and property acquired without anyone else effort, mechanical workmanship, etc as a married women, over which she had restricted rights on such property and can’t distance it without the assent of her better half.
This disarray of women’s restricted rights on specific was settled by Privy Council referencing that the property with restricted rights as women’s domain whereby the female proprietor accepts it as a restricted proprietor as it were. This privilege of women in property was first perceived by the lawmaking bodies just with the implementation of The Hindu Women Rights to Property Act, 1937. However, just one sort of women for example widow’s privilege got acknowledgment where any Hindu bites the dust intestate leaving her, at that point she can guarantee partition as a male proprietor. In spite of the fact that this privilege was restricted in nature for example she requires assent of male individuals to discard this current women’s bequest. This would be unquestionably seen as an achievement throughout the entire existence of women’s property rights, however it was restricted in scope and oppressed the women’s status simple to her marital connection making it base for such case in property.
So to defeat the anomalies made by the previously mentioned act, The assemblies at last presented an act named The Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Yet at the same time the act was not satisfactory enough to perceive the coparcenary of daughters in the Joint Hindu Family. So this made a disservice upon the daughter as they don’t reserve an option to look for partition. Yet, with the progressions got by the revision of 2005, the daughter became coparcener, getting all privileges of the coparcener including the option to look for partition for her offer in the Joint Hindu Property.
Furthermore, by excellence of this new arrangement all the distance or partition or testamentary partition influenced before the twentieth December 2004 won’t be influenced.