Skip to main content

affidavit on wealth tax return

 AFFIDAVIT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR AMENDING THE  WEALTH-TAX RETURN 


Before the Wealth-tax Officer ..........................,............. 


Affidavit of A, aged about................. years, son of Shri ......... resident of ........................................ 

I, A, aged about ..................... years, son of Shri ................ resident of......................................... do hereby solemnly affirm and state as under: 

1.              That I am the assessee in the aforesaid case and as such fully conversant with the facts deposed to below. 

2.              That I have filed the return of wealth-tax for the assessment year .......... on ....................

3.              That [SB1] [SB2] in the said return, the particulars of shares and debentures held by me have been wrongly given. The mistake is typing mistake and is inadvertent. 

4.              That the particulars of shares and debentures held by me have been given in the list which is attached herewith. 

5.              That the mistake came to notice, when my Advocate saw the papers in connection with the production of evidence before the Wealth-tax Officer, 

6.              That in view of the above, it is requested that the return of wealth-tax may be amended and particulars of shares and debentures held by me given in the said return may be substituted with the list attached herewith. 


I, A, the abovenamed deponent do hereby declare and verify that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 5 are true to my knowledge and the contents of para 6 are my submissions to this Hon'ble Wealth-tax Officer and nothing material has been concealed, and no part of it is false. 


Verified at ............ on this.................... day of .................... 2000.


Deponent



Date ......................... 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 [SB1]

 [SB2]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting:

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting: 1. Clarity and Precision: Use clear and precise language to convey the intended meaning accurately. Avoid ambiguity or vagueness in drafting provisions. 2. Structure and Organization: Organize the document logically with headings, subheadings, and numbered lists to enhance readability and comprehension. 3. Consistency: Maintain consistency in terminology, formatting, and style throughout the document to avoid confusion. 4. Compliance with Legal Framework: Ensure that the document complies with relevant laws, regulations, and legal principles applicable to the subject matter. 5. Customization for Specific Needs: Tailor the document to meet the specific needs, preferences, and circumstances of the parties involved. 6. Risk Management: Identify and address potential legal risks, liabilities, and obligations associated with the subject matter of the document. 7. Precision in Drafting: Be precise and meticulous in drafting provisi

LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS

  8uShri B. P. Hira Works vs Shri C. M. Pradhan Factual matrix The Court of Appeal dealt with a group of 174 appeals by special leave arising from several application made against B.P. Hira, Works Manager at the Central Railway Workshop and Factory in Parel, Bombay, under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, claiming overtime wages since 1948. The main judgment was delivered by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, in the application filed by C.M. Pradhan, which gave rise to Civil Appeal No. 131 of 1957. The respondent claimed that he was entitled to overtime wages for work on Sundays when he was not given a holiday within three days prior to or three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked. The appellant conceded that the respondent had not been given a holiday within the three days prior to or the three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked as required by s. 52 of the Indian Factories Act. The respondent alleged that he was a worker within the meaning of s. 2, sub-

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country. Below are some of the most notable ones: 1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) Principle Established: Basic Structure Doctrine Significance: The judgment held that while the Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the "basic structure" or essential features of the Constitution. This doctrine serves as a limitation on the amending power of the Parliament. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) Principle Established: Expansive Interpretation of Article 21 Significance: The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include various rights such as the right to travel abroad and the right to a fair and reasonable procedure. 3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) Principle Established: Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Significan