Skip to main content

Scope of Sociological Jurisprudence

 Scope of Sociological Jurisprudence

By Shagun Mahendroo



SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE

The study of society, social change and human behaviour is known as sociology and the study of law and the legal perspective of things is known as jurisprudence. The sociological school of law asserts that the law and society are intertwined to each other. This school of thought contends that the law is a social concept since it affects so many people. Sociological jurisprudence focus on studying law by relating it with the society.

Features of Sociological School of Law:

  1. The Sociological School of Law fully disregards positivism, i.e., sovereign authority, as well as historical jurisprudence.

  2. The Sociological School of Law places a greater focus on the practical side of law than on its abstract nature.

  3. It has direct impact on society and form laws in response to social needs.

Behind every legal element, there is a hand of sociology. The crimes which are committed are somewhat sociological in nature. The concept of sociology will help the lawyers or judge to understand the motive of the crime and accordingly the punishment will be given. Sociology has brought a new change in study of jurisprudence.

Emergence of Sociological Jurisprudence:

The most fundamental cause for the formation of the sociological school of jurisprudence is Laissez-Faire. When it comes to dealing with the economy, society or individuals, it refers to a policy of minimal government intervention. This law was enacted in response to the growing importance of the laissez-faire philosophy. However, as laissez-faire has developed and grown, there appears to be a large emphasis and focus on individual advancement. The sociological school arose as a reaction to laissez-faire because sociological school promotes an equilibrium between the welfare of the state and the interests of individuals.

Works by the early people of new societal interests such as Bentham, Renner, Weber and to satisfy the social demands of modern society are also a factor of emergence.



Founders

Auguste Comte, a French theorist, is father of sociological school of law. His main focus is on empirical approaches, which use observations and experiences to create social facts. Comte is a believer of the fundamental law governing mental growth. Comet’s view was largely influenced by mechanical analogies. Biology is the next step in the evolution of the sociology school. Here the theory of Darwin denies the claim to absolute truth/reality. Herbert Spencer made a suggestion that law is subject to change as a result of community development. Points given by scholars who have contributed to the development of sociological jurisprudence are summarized as follows:

  1. Law is a socially regulated norm and not a universal system.

  2. The legislation in force cannot solve problems that are based on economy and society.

  3. In the context of their period, no law is a limitless and fixed set of laws, but they are relative to society, time and a specific location.

  4. Social justice is a dynamic phenomenon, not a static one.

  5. When the approach to law and state welfare is measured, the importance of sociological school of law is clearly seen.

Sociological Jurisprudence in India

In India, sociological jurisprudence can be found in various of laws and enactments. There have been various instances where the concept of sociological jurisprudence has been mentioned and taken into account when making a decision.

  1. In case of N. Adithayan vs The Travancore Devaswom Board and Ors, it was held that the caste distinctions could not be permitted to pervade the society's social structure. As a result, the Court maintained its position that any form of discrimination on the basis of untouchablity would be unacceptable.

  2. In case of Ashok Kr Gupta & others vs State of Uttar Pradesh, it was observed that court is not obligated to accept an interpretation that hinders social inclusion



In the abolishment of triple talaq, the sociological factor was brought up related to equal rights of women. There was difference in opinions of judges this is why the judgement took so much of time. The majority used a social strategy to protect women's right. Some of them, on the other hand, took the conventional approach of understanding it as unaffected because it falls under personal laws, which are not covered by Article 13. At the end the Apex court's Social Jurisprudential approach recognised women's fundamental rights, invalidating the arbitrary practise of triple talaq under Muslim personal law.

Conclusion:

Every issue in India has a legal and sociological perspective like the legal side of female infanticide. Bengal Ordinance XXI declared infanticide to be crime in 1795. The government has taken steps to prevent female foeticide and infanticide. Its social aspect is that nature produced both genders to secure  human race. Gender equality and women empowerment also comes under sociological aspect.

Eugen Ehrlich, August Comte, Duguit and Roscoe Pound are all jurists of Sociological School of Jurisprudence. Society can develop, according to August Comte, if it is guided by scientific principles. While Eugen Ehrlich stated, “society is the most important source of law” and Roscoe Pound related lawyers to engineers 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting:

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting: 1. Clarity and Precision: Use clear and precise language to convey the intended meaning accurately. Avoid ambiguity or vagueness in drafting provisions. 2. Structure and Organization: Organize the document logically with headings, subheadings, and numbered lists to enhance readability and comprehension. 3. Consistency: Maintain consistency in terminology, formatting, and style throughout the document to avoid confusion. 4. Compliance with Legal Framework: Ensure that the document complies with relevant laws, regulations, and legal principles applicable to the subject matter. 5. Customization for Specific Needs: Tailor the document to meet the specific needs, preferences, and circumstances of the parties involved. 6. Risk Management: Identify and address potential legal risks, liabilities, and obligations associated with the subject matter of the document. 7. Precision in Drafting: Be precise and meticulous in drafting provisi

LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS

  8uShri B. P. Hira Works vs Shri C. M. Pradhan Factual matrix The Court of Appeal dealt with a group of 174 appeals by special leave arising from several application made against B.P. Hira, Works Manager at the Central Railway Workshop and Factory in Parel, Bombay, under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, claiming overtime wages since 1948. The main judgment was delivered by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, in the application filed by C.M. Pradhan, which gave rise to Civil Appeal No. 131 of 1957. The respondent claimed that he was entitled to overtime wages for work on Sundays when he was not given a holiday within three days prior to or three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked. The appellant conceded that the respondent had not been given a holiday within the three days prior to or the three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked as required by s. 52 of the Indian Factories Act. The respondent alleged that he was a worker within the meaning of s. 2, sub-

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country. Below are some of the most notable ones: 1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) Principle Established: Basic Structure Doctrine Significance: The judgment held that while the Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the "basic structure" or essential features of the Constitution. This doctrine serves as a limitation on the amending power of the Parliament. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) Principle Established: Expansive Interpretation of Article 21 Significance: The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include various rights such as the right to travel abroad and the right to a fair and reasonable procedure. 3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) Principle Established: Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Significan