Skip to main content

Right To Privacy Through Perspective of Article 21

 Right To Privacy Through Perspective of Article 21

By Shagun Mahendroo


Fundamental Rights, which are written in Part III of the Indian Constitution, were created to defend citizens' rights and give them with a sense of security and freedom. These rights also prevent authoritarian and dictatorial rule from taking root in the country. Every individual has the right to live a life of liberty and dignity. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution is one of the most important fundamental rights.

Article 21 of India's 1949 Constitution: Right to Life and Personal Liberty

No one's life or personal liberty can be taken away from them unless they follow the legal procedure.

Article 21, popularly regarded as the constitution's heart, grants citizens and non-citizens of India the right to vote. This fundamental right encompasses a wide range of rights in addition to life and liberty. The word "personal liberty" has been debated in numerous cases, with the most recent case being Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Anr (1978), in which a Delhi Regional officer ordered the petitioner Maneka Gandhi to surrender her passport within seven days without giving her a reason.

The Supreme Court ruled that "Personal Liberty" encompassed a wide range of rights, and that such rights could only be revoked after a legal procedure that was just, fair, and reasonable, not arbitrary. Personal liberty refers to a set of rights that guarantee a person's freedom.

The court further stated that the right to life encompasses not just a bodily right but also the right to live with dignity. Simply having the right to survive is not enough for anyone to live peacefully; everyone should have the right to dignity, which entails having access to the fundamental necessities of life as well as having control over one's own decisions.Fair salaries, clean air, access to food, and other basic necessities are all part of the right to dignity.

The term "right to life" is used in Article 21 to refer to the right to participate in activities, as well as the right to tradition, heritage, culture, and livelihood. The right to privacy is one of the most crucial aspects of life. Every human being desires some level of privacy in their lives. No one wants others to invade into their personal space and disrupt their joy and quiet.

For a long time, citizens have been denied the right to privacy, and there has been much dispute about it. There is no express clause in the constitution that emphasises the right to private. Even the data we save on our phones and laptops is private information that must be secured; if the information is stolen, our right to privacy is violated, and a fundamental right is violated. Unprotected data infringes on one's right to privacy.

The first time the right to privacy was discussed was in the case of Kharak Singh v. Kharak Singh's house was visited by the police at odd hours, frequently waking him up from his sleep, and the court held that this infringed on his 'right to life,' but the court dismissed the petitioner's allegation that the shadowing of chronic criminals infringed on his right to privacy, as the right to privacy was not recognised as a Fundamental Right at the time.

Before it was recognised a basic right, the right to privacy was just that: a right. Right to Privacy was recognised as a Fundamental Right in the landmark case K.S. Puttaswamy V. Union of India, which was passed in 2017, and was subsequently incorporated in Article 21 as a Right to Life and Personal Liberty.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting:

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting: 1. Clarity and Precision: Use clear and precise language to convey the intended meaning accurately. Avoid ambiguity or vagueness in drafting provisions. 2. Structure and Organization: Organize the document logically with headings, subheadings, and numbered lists to enhance readability and comprehension. 3. Consistency: Maintain consistency in terminology, formatting, and style throughout the document to avoid confusion. 4. Compliance with Legal Framework: Ensure that the document complies with relevant laws, regulations, and legal principles applicable to the subject matter. 5. Customization for Specific Needs: Tailor the document to meet the specific needs, preferences, and circumstances of the parties involved. 6. Risk Management: Identify and address potential legal risks, liabilities, and obligations associated with the subject matter of the document. 7. Precision in Drafting: Be precise and meticulous in drafting provisi

LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS

  8uShri B. P. Hira Works vs Shri C. M. Pradhan Factual matrix The Court of Appeal dealt with a group of 174 appeals by special leave arising from several application made against B.P. Hira, Works Manager at the Central Railway Workshop and Factory in Parel, Bombay, under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, claiming overtime wages since 1948. The main judgment was delivered by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, in the application filed by C.M. Pradhan, which gave rise to Civil Appeal No. 131 of 1957. The respondent claimed that he was entitled to overtime wages for work on Sundays when he was not given a holiday within three days prior to or three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked. The appellant conceded that the respondent had not been given a holiday within the three days prior to or the three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked as required by s. 52 of the Indian Factories Act. The respondent alleged that he was a worker within the meaning of s. 2, sub-

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country. Below are some of the most notable ones: 1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) Principle Established: Basic Structure Doctrine Significance: The judgment held that while the Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the "basic structure" or essential features of the Constitution. This doctrine serves as a limitation on the amending power of the Parliament. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) Principle Established: Expansive Interpretation of Article 21 Significance: The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include various rights such as the right to travel abroad and the right to a fair and reasonable procedure. 3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) Principle Established: Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Significan