Skip to main content

History and Origin of Human rights by Nandani

 History and origin of Human rights by Nandani singhania

History can be divided into three part, medieval history , ancient history and modern  history .
We can say that during the stage of medieval history , human rights didn’t exist in particular , as in certain rights were performed and followed but it didn’t had a particular name for it .Not everyone were given the right to equality but we can say it existed in some particular areas and fields.
For example – Urukagine of lagash (3260)BC , Indian Vedic era (1500-5000) BC – Dharma
During the medieval age that is the era after christ (AD) the first witness of human rights regulation was noticed In Britain , king of Britain during 15th June 1215 introduced Magna Carta under which human rights guidelines were stated.
During the ancient history a sequence of human right guidelines were introduced.
After the introduction of magna carta in year 1215 ,petition of rights 1628 , habeas corpus act 1679 ,bill of rights 1689 was brought into real life. The introduction of all these rights and acts with time eradicated the practice of slavery , human trafficking as it gave rise to sense of value of each individual and humankind.
Modern history
During the first world war , the league of nation was introduced and America had a major role behind its formation , but its purpose was an utter failure as 2nd world war took place ,
After the end of second world war, 51 country came together and formed an organization named UNO.
Under which all the member states were developed and developing countries , UNO has 6 organization under it , out of which one is general assembly . On 10th December, 1948  , it ,  made a universal declaration of Human Rights 1948. 

India has been a victim of slavery by the Britisher , in short they have been treated like animals because of their nationality , they were discriminated for the color of their skin,  they were illtreated and also their lives were given no value. They didn’t had the freedom to freely move wherever they want , they  didn’t even had the liberty to pursue with the business they want to set up .
So, during the independence of India , 1947 , Indian constitution was being formed , India was one of the state of UNO and hence after the declaration of HR , India after knowing the benefits of HR , wanted to introduce it to the Indian constitution as well, so, constitution makers introduced fundamental rights in the Indian constitution.

Human is not a gender oriented word , so , irrespective of any gender , every human is born with certain rights , like human born with skin on its body, are born with certain rights too,
in respective of anything , they have particular rights  which cannot be snatched for them  , but in certain cases like if a person breaks the law or national securities , it can be restrictive in nature
section 2(d)  of thee protection the human rights Act , right to life -  their existence , a human’s existence cannot be questioned , they have the right to be born and live
Right to liberty – freedom , a state of mind , a human has the right be himself/herself , cannot be kept confined to a place , or cannot be a prey to slavery . A person cannot be subject to arrest and detention except as provided for by law.
Right to dignity – a person has the right to be respected ,to be behaved ethically .They have the right to live with respect irrespective of their caste ,creed , religion .
Also , the Indian constitution says that  a person born has the right to choose its religion , it profession,  its geographical position within it’s nation . a human cannot be barred from moving one place to another until ordered by the court .
The objective behind the entry of human right is to
protect the quality of life of humankind and to develop individual .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting:

The top 10 things to remember for doing good legal drafting: 1. Clarity and Precision: Use clear and precise language to convey the intended meaning accurately. Avoid ambiguity or vagueness in drafting provisions. 2. Structure and Organization: Organize the document logically with headings, subheadings, and numbered lists to enhance readability and comprehension. 3. Consistency: Maintain consistency in terminology, formatting, and style throughout the document to avoid confusion. 4. Compliance with Legal Framework: Ensure that the document complies with relevant laws, regulations, and legal principles applicable to the subject matter. 5. Customization for Specific Needs: Tailor the document to meet the specific needs, preferences, and circumstances of the parties involved. 6. Risk Management: Identify and address potential legal risks, liabilities, and obligations associated with the subject matter of the document. 7. Precision in Drafting: Be precise and meticulous in drafting provisi

LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS

  8uShri B. P. Hira Works vs Shri C. M. Pradhan Factual matrix The Court of Appeal dealt with a group of 174 appeals by special leave arising from several application made against B.P. Hira, Works Manager at the Central Railway Workshop and Factory in Parel, Bombay, under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, claiming overtime wages since 1948. The main judgment was delivered by the Payment of Wages Authority, Bombay, in the application filed by C.M. Pradhan, which gave rise to Civil Appeal No. 131 of 1957. The respondent claimed that he was entitled to overtime wages for work on Sundays when he was not given a holiday within three days prior to or three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked. The appellant conceded that the respondent had not been given a holiday within the three days prior to or the three days subsequent to the Sundays on which he worked as required by s. 52 of the Indian Factories Act. The respondent alleged that he was a worker within the meaning of s. 2, sub-

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country

The Supreme Court of India has delivered several landmark judgments that have significantly shaped the legal landscape of the country. Below are some of the most notable ones: 1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) Principle Established: Basic Structure Doctrine Significance: The judgment held that while the Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter the "basic structure" or essential features of the Constitution. This doctrine serves as a limitation on the amending power of the Parliament. 2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) Principle Established: Expansive Interpretation of Article 21 Significance: The Supreme Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) to include various rights such as the right to travel abroad and the right to a fair and reasonable procedure. 3. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) Principle Established: Balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Significan